In a bombshell that has the internet exploding once again, eagle-eyed fans and skeptics alike are zooming in on recent a

nd archived photos of Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, claiming undeniable proof that her famous pregnancy bumps were nothing more than elaborate fakes.

“Hey Meghan Markle, we can see your prosthetic bump under your outfit!” one viral post screamed, and now thousands are piling on, pointing to creases, folds, and suspicious “pops” that suggest the former royal was sporting a Hollywood-style “moonbump” prosthetic all along.

This isn’t just idle gossip – it’s a full-blown revival of the long-simmering conspiracy that Meghan never actually carried her children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, opting instead for surrogates while strapping on silicone bellies to maintain the illusion. And with new “evidence” circulating from old royal engagements, the debate is hotter than ever. Buckle up, because we’re diving deep into the photos, videos, and expert “analyses” that have convinced many that the Duchess’s pregnancies were one big royal deception. ### The Infamous “Squatgate” That Started It All Let’s rewind to 2019, when Meghan was heavily pregnant with Archie during a visit to Birkenhead.

In one now-iconic video clip, the Duchess squats down effortlessly in high heels to chat with admirers – knees together, no wobble, springing back up like she’s not carrying an extra 30 pounds in front. But watch closely: as she rises, her bump appears to “fold” inward before “popping” back out with an audible snap! Conspiracy theorists went wild. “That’s not a real baby bump – real pregnant women can’t squat like that without their belly getting in the way,” one popular YouTube breakdown claims, viewed millions of times. “And that popping sound? That’s the prosthetic re-inflating or the straps snapping back into place!” Slow-motion replays show what looks like a crease running across the bump, as if it’s made of flexible silicone rather than stretched skin.

Pregnant women chimed in on forums: “I was 8 months pregnant and couldn’t even bend over without help – let alone squat in heels!” another said. Experts in prosthetic design (from film and TV) have noted that high-end “moonbumps” – realistic silicone bellies used in movies – are strapped on with fabric bodysuits and can indeed crease or shift if not fitted perfectly. Companies like Moonbump specialize in these, offering progressive sizes for a “full pregnancy journey.” Coincidence? Skeptics say no. ### The “Deflating” Bump and Disappearing Act Fast-forward through countless public appearances, and the “evidence” piles up.

In photos from the same day in Birkenhead, Meghan’s bump seems to vanish entirely under her coat in one shot, only to reappear massively in the next. “Magic baby bump!” critics dubbed it. Similar “disappearances” happened in Morocco and other tours – one moment flat as a board, the next protruding dramatically. Then there’s the infamous “bump drop” moment: in slow-mo videos, it allegedly slips down toward her knees before she adjusts her coat. “No real bump does that – it’s clearly a prosthetic sliding out of position,” insist moonbump believers.

And Meghan’s habit of constantly cradling or holding her belly? “She’s keeping it from falling off!” they argue. Even in more recent “throwback” content, like the 2025-released hospital twerking video before Lilibet’s birth, detractors spot irregularities: the bump looks “too high,” “too firm,” or has odd “lumps” that don’t move naturally. “That’s not baby’s limbs – that’s padding shifting!” one viral thread claims. ### Why Go to Such Lengths? The Surrogate Theory If the bumps were fake, why? The prevailing theory: surrogates carried both Archie and Lilibet, allowing Meghan to avoid the physical toll of pregnancy while controlling the narrative.

At 37 for Archie and 39 for Lilibet, fertility challenges aren’t uncommon, and Hollywood stars often use surrogates discreetly. Insiders and family members have fueled the fire. Meghan’s estranged half-sister Samantha has repeatedly questioned the pregnancies, and even her father Thomas Sr. allegedly hinted at frozen eggs and surrogacy plans. Tabloid “sources” claim palace courtiers whispered about the “cloak-and-dagger secrecy” surrounding the births – no traditional hospital photos, delayed announcements, and births in private U.S. clinics for Lilibet.

Prosthetics make sense for public life: a moonbump lets you “show” progression without real changes like swelling ankles (which Meghan notably lacked) or weight gain elsewhere. She stayed slim-faced and energetic, squatting, dancing, and traveling right up to due dates – behaviors many moms say are impossible in late pregnancy. ### The Moonbump Industry:

Too Realistic for Comfort? Dig deeper, and the tech exists. Sites like Moonbump offer hyper-realistic silicone prosthetics that “look and feel real,” worn all day with breathable bodysuits. Used in films, TV, and even by private clients, they come in sizes mimicking trimesters. Testimonials praise how they “fool everyone.”

One viral post juxtaposes Meghan’s bump with product photos – the similarities in shape and sheen are uncanny. And that “shiny” bare bump photo from her 2025 anniversary mood board? “Too glossy, like silicone!” critics howl. “Real skin doesn’t reflect light like that.” ### Backlash and Defenders: But the “Proof” Keeps Coming Of course, defenders call this misogynistic trolling, pointing to midwives who say squats are possible for fit women and “lumps” are just baby parts. But with thousands of dissected photos, videos, and side-by-sides circulating on social media, the moonbump camp is growing. “If it was real, why not share more natural moments?” they ask. “Why the constant adjustments and odd shapes?”

As 2026 dawns, this story isn’t going away. Meghan’s silence only fans the flames – is it privacy, or something to hide? One thing’s clear: the world is watching every “bump” in the road for the Sussexes. What do YOU think – real pregnancies or royal ruse? Drop your thoughts below, because this exposé is just the beginning! *(Sources include archived royal footage, public photos, and online analyses from 2019-2025. All claims represent circulating theories and are not independently verified.)*